In the intricate world of food logistics, ensuring the safety and quality of perishable goods from farm to table is a priority that can no longer be sidelined. Recent research highlighted in the paper “Two underestimated threats in food transportation: mould and acceleration” by Janssen et al. draws attention to two critical, yet often overlooked, factors that significantly impact food quality during transportation: mould contamination and the physical effects of acceleration, such as vibration. These findings underscore the urgent need for innovative solutions in the logistics industry to monitor and mitigate these risks effectively.

Enter Altered Carbon Ltd, a pioneering company at the forefront of agricultural and logistical innovation, whose groundbreaking technologies, K9Sense and ScentStudio.AI, are set to revolutionize the way we approach food transportation safety. By mimicking the human nose’s acute ability to detect decay, Altered Carbon’s AI-driven platforms offer early detection of spoilage and disease, providing a proactive solution to a problem that has long plagued the food logistics sector.


The Invisible Foes: Mould and Acceleration

Mould growth during transportation not only poses a health hazard but can also lead to significant economic losses through contaminated goods. Similarly, the physical stress of acceleration and vibration can damage products, affecting their quality and shelf life. For instance, the research highlights how vibrations can alter the turbidity of beer, a key indicator of its quality, underscoring the need for precise monitoring tools.

Altered Carbon’s K9Sense technology is adept at detecting early signs of spoilage, such as grey mould in strawberries, thus extending their shelf life and maintaining freshness. Its ability to adapt to various environmental conditions, including humidity and temperature changes, makes it an indispensable tool in the logistical arsenal against food spoilage and waste.


ScentStudio.AI: A New Frontier in Quality Control

ScentStudio.AI takes the capabilities of K9Sense further by analyzing data and tuning machine learning models to recognize millions of scent combinations. This technology is crucial for the early detection of mould and other spoilage indicators, offering real-time monitoring capabilities that can alert logistics operators to potential issues before they escalate.

The adaptability and customization offered by Altered Carbon’s technologies allow for seamless integration into existing monitoring systems, ensuring that businesses can protect their cargo without significant infrastructure overhauls. Moreover, the environmental responsibility ingrained in Altered Carbon’s ethos—evidenced by our use of sustainable materials and low-power sensors—aligns with the growing demand for eco-friendly business practices.

Transforming Challenges into Opportunities

The logistics industry stands at a crossroads, where the adoption of advanced technologies like those offered by Altered Carbon Ltd could significantly reduce losses and enhance food safety. By transitioning from reactive to proactive management of food quality, businesses can not only safeguard public health but also improve their bottom line.

The integration of K9Sense and ScentStudio.AI technologies into food transportation systems exemplifies how innovation can address the complex challenges of food safety and quality. As the industry evolves, Altered Carbon Ltd’s solutions represent a beacon of hope, illuminating the path towards a safer, more sustainable future for food logistics.

In conclusion, as we navigate the complexities of modern food transportation, the integration of intelligent monitoring systems like those developed by Altered Carbon Ltd is not just beneficial but essential. By harnessing the power of AI and sensor technology, we can ensure that our food remains safe, fresh, and delicious from farm to table, transforming the overlooked threats of mould and acceleration into manageable challenges.



  1. Jedermann R, Pötsch T, Lloyd C. 2014. Communication techniques and challenges for wireless food quality monitoring. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20130304 ( 10.1098/rsta.2013.0304) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauriegel E, Giebel A, Geyer M, Schmidt U, Herppich W. 2011. Early detection of Fusarium infection in wheat using hyper-spectral imaging. Comput. Electron. Agriculture 75, 304–312. ( 10.1016/j.compag.2010.12.006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aba IP, Gana YM, Ogbonnaya C. 2012. Simulated transport damage study on fresh tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) fruits. Agricultural Eng. Int. CIGR J. 14, 119–126. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chonhenchob V, Sittipod S, Swasdee D, Rachtanapun P, Singh S, Singh JA. 2009. Effect of truck vibration during transport on damage to fresh produce shipments in Thailand. Ind. Technol. 3, 27–38. [Google Scholar]
  5. Geyer MO, Präger U, König C, Graf A, Trüppel I, Schlüter O, Herold B. 2009. Measuring behavior of an acceleration measuring unit implanted in potatoes. Trans. ASABE 52, 1267–1274. ( 10.13031/2013.27770) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kunze W. 2004. Technology brewing and malting, pp. 493–494. Berlin, Germany: VLB. [Google Scholar]
  7. European Brewery Convention. Prediction of shelf-life of beer. See
  8. Hertog MLATM, Uysal I, McCarthy U, Verlinden BM, Nicolaï BM. 2014. Shelf life modelling for first-expired-first-out warehouse management. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20130306 ( 10.1098/rsta.2013.0306) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. German Marine Insurers (GDV). 2014. Microbiological causes of spoilage. Berlin, Germany: German Marine Insurers; See [Google Scholar]
  10. Sogawa K, Watanabe M, Sato K, Segawa S, Ishii C, Miyabe A, Murata S, Saito T, Nomura F. 2011. Use of the MALDI BioTyper system with MALDI–TOF mass spectrometry for rapid identification of microorganisms. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 400, 1905–1911. ( 10.1007/s00216-011-4877-7) [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Albers B, Stoeck T. 1998. Extraktion und Bestimmung von AMP, ADP und ATP. Vereinigung für Allgemeine und Angewandte Mikrobiologie (VAAM)(ed) Mikrobiologische Charakterisierung aquatischer Sedimente, pp. 36–46. Munich, Germany: Oldenbourg. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rupp S. 2012. FYI—fungi yeast identification. See
  13. Fischer G, Müller T, Schwalbe R, Ostrowski R, Dott W. 2000. Species-specific profiles of mycotoxins produced in cultures and associated with conidia of airborne fungi derived from biowaste. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 203, 105–116. ( 10.1078/S1438-4639(04)70015-2) [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Abbott SP. 2002. Mycotoxins and indoor molds. Indoor Environ. Connect. 3, 14–24. [Google Scholar]
  15. Flannigan B, Miller JD, Samson R, Flannigan M, Verhoeff A, Adan O, Hoekstra E. 1994. Health implications of fungi in indoor environments: an overview. In Health implications of fungi in indoor environments, pp. 3–28. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wöllenstein J, Plaza J, Cane C, Min Y, Böttner H, Tuller H. 2003. A novel single chip thin film metal oxide array. Sens. Actuators B 93, 350–355. ( 10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00218-1) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilkins K, Larsen K, Simkus M. 2000. Volatile metabolites from mold growth on building materials and synthetic media. Chemosphere 41, 437–446. ( 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00273-8) [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Endres H. 1998. Device with reception means encapsulating materials. EP Patent no. 0873789. [Google Scholar]
  19. Roth M, Vogel S, Schaber U, Endres H-E. 1997. Electrically removable, micromachined encapsulation for sensitive materials. Sens. Actuators A 62, 633–635. ( 10.1016/S0924-4247(97)01482-9) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Samson RA, Houbraken J, Thrane U, Frisvad JC, Andersen B. 2010. Food and indoor fungi. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre. [Google Scholar]
  21. Spiller E, Schöll A, Alexy R, Kümmerer K, Urban G. 2006. A sensitive microsystem as biosensor for cell growth monitoring and antibiotic testing. Sens. Actuators A 130, 312–321. ( 10.1016/j.sna.2006.02.051) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Contact Us

9 + 3 =